(no subject)

[razorjak]

Jeeeeeesus FUCKSHIT!!!

Gods, how do these people's brains function? How can they parse this shit? As far as I can tell, this is truly how their minds are set:

Anything good that happened in the Clinton administration happened in spite of him.
Everything bad that happened was directly his fault or that of his wife.
Anything good that has come about during Shrubbo's tenure as Chimp in Thief is directly his glory.
Everything that goes wrong was due to those pesky liberals and leftists who are trying hard to undermine his "great work".

Anything I halfhandedly might "blame" on Bush immediately brings out comments of how "this decision had nothing to do with Bush. It was entirely a seperate group who came up with it." And more than half of those commments end with " ... probably a hold-over from Clinton."

Seriously? How can it go from "All the president's fault" to "Not the president's fault" simply due to the token political party each gets their funding?

Comments

[anarmyofjuan.livejournal.com]

down here in the city it seems the polar opposite. personally, I think Bush has done a few good things, and a few bad things. I felt the same way about Clinton. as far as I'm concerned, we haven't had a great president in decades. but, of course, I'm neither conservative nor liberal. everyone else seems to be one extreme or another around here.

[razorjak.livejournal.com]

as far as I'm concerned, we haven't had a great president in decades.

Agreed ...

I just find it funny how many of the bushophiles and those brainwashed by the spooge expelled by the repugnicans try to label me a Clinton-lover.

BTW - for those who don't understand why I use the term repugnican:

They aren't republicans. Republicans are supposed to be for states rights and a smaller federal government. This is EXACTLY the opposite of what this administration has done since day one.

[montieth.livejournal.com]

So when Ted Kennedy stands up and starts talking about states rights because it's his avenue for opposing the President, your response is...?

[razorjak.livejournal.com]

My response is, "Did someone just shit their pants? Something stinks."

[montieth.livejournal.com]

I had to read it three times in the news paper. Kennedy citing States Rights....Did hell just freeze over?

[montieth.livejournal.com]

This is one of those examples. And he cites Rehnquist too! *falls out of chair*

SEN. EDWARD KENNEDY: Quick answer on that. We believe the states ought to make those judgments. Why not let the states do it? They are dealing with these kinds of issues every single day in courthouses all across this country. Let the states make those judgments and decisions. They have different judgments about it. Let the states make that determination. And I would have thought the president... We hear a great deal about states' rights. This is the golden opportunity to support that. And it isn't only those of us, bipartisan, Senator McCain and John Edwards, that take that position. This has been recommended by the judicial conference. It's been recommended by the Chief Justice Rehnquist