Date: 2006-01-17 11:52 pm (UTC)
I don't agree with the policy.

But it sounds more like a liability issue that the Defence Department is worried about. Sounds like they'd rather pay our benefits to a soldier killed in their "endorsed" armour then other.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

razorjak: (Default)
BrickJAK

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526 272829
3031     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 01:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios