razorjak: (bush no-sense)
BrickJAK ([personal profile] razorjak) wrote2008-02-28 01:00 pm

(no subject)

So Chimpy McFuckstick doesn't think we're heading into a recession.

He thinks it's "patentedly" unfair if the telecom companies are actually held accountable for their illegal actions.

...

I can't even go on. My brain wants to implode from listening to that dipshit.

[identity profile] montieth.livejournal.com 2008-02-28 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
The job Bill Clinton was working on.

Then there was his speech:

Here's the relevant line.

"The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people," Clinton said.

Or was Clinton's speech and Operation Desert Fox all just a bunch of smoke to get out of the way of Congress. Personally I believed him and as unhappy as I was that he lied under oath, I was happy to see him prosecute a fight against Iraq.

[identity profile] geekalpha.livejournal.com 2008-02-28 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
We are way past the statute of limitations for "blame Bill Clinton."

If Hillary gets elected, you can trot all the crap back out, but it really doesn't wash anymore.

[identity profile] montieth.livejournal.com 2008-02-28 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Same Policy. Same arguments. Same stated objectives. It's only wrong if Bush says it?

You say one is valid but the other is not.

I say both arguments are valid.

How about some consistency?

[identity profile] geekalpha.livejournal.com 2008-02-28 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Sure.

It consistently annoys me how a specific irrelevant ex-president makes it in to current events discussions.

Clinton did bad: don't care, irrelevant.
Clinton did same: don't care, irrelevant.
Clinton did good: don't care, irrelevant.

That's pretty consistent.