#2 Fucking stop waving the flag at me and hiding behind the "you aren't supporting the troops" line.
My statements explicitly pointing out the justification for the invasion of Iraq were proven to be cynically false, and that continued operations there are absurdly expensive and completely ineffective for any useful foreign policy objective are not hurting the soldiers you love hiding behind.
And while I am on that subject, go ahead and correct me if I am wrong, but it appears to me that you are not now nor have you ever been a serving member of the military. You seem ever so eager to risk other people's necks, ride on top of their successes, and hide behind them crying that any disagreement with you (and the senseless amateurish failed policy of the neocons and the Bush administration) is disgracing the soldiers, spitting on them and calling them baby-killers. This is simply childish, and I know damn well who I would be resenting if I were still in the service, and it wouldn't be hippies or people sick of the war, it would be chicken-hawks like you standing on my dick.
#3 I never stated any such position*, but you insist on making pedantic pointless statements that have absolutely nothing to do with anything I have said or believe you nattering tit.
And then you have the gall to say if you are paying attention.
One of us isn't paying attention, but I think I'll join you because engaging with neo-con fan-boy mouthpieces like you is much like masturbating with a cheese-grater. Mildly amusing but mostly painful.
I still fail to see why people like you pray at the house of spin and talking-points, but clearly I will get no insight from someone I suspect could not pass the Turing Test.
* That Clinton paid the debt. This is ludicrous in the extreme, and most importantly, completely irrelevant to anything I have ever said or implied. Pay attention.
Re: TANSTAFL PT II.
Date: 2008-03-01 02:39 am (UTC)I will say again:
#1 Clinton = don't care.
Shut up about it.
#2 Fucking stop waving the flag at me and hiding behind the "you aren't supporting the troops" line.
My statements explicitly pointing out the justification for the invasion of Iraq were proven to be cynically false, and that continued operations there are absurdly expensive and completely ineffective for any useful foreign policy objective are not hurting the soldiers you love hiding behind.
And while I am on that subject, go ahead and correct me if I am wrong, but it appears to me that you are not now nor have you ever been a serving member of the military. You seem ever so eager to risk other people's necks, ride on top of their successes, and hide behind them crying that any disagreement with you (and the senseless amateurish failed policy of the neocons and the Bush administration) is disgracing the soldiers, spitting on them and calling them baby-killers. This is simply childish, and I know damn well who I would be resenting if I were still in the service, and it wouldn't be hippies or people sick of the war, it would be chicken-hawks like you standing on my dick.
#3 I never stated any such position*, but you insist on making pedantic pointless statements that have absolutely nothing to do with anything I have said or believe you nattering tit.
And then you have the gall to say if you are paying attention.
One of us isn't paying attention, but I think I'll join you because engaging with neo-con fan-boy mouthpieces like you is much like masturbating with a cheese-grater. Mildly amusing but mostly painful.
I still fail to see why people like you pray at the house of spin and talking-points, but clearly I will get no insight from someone I suspect could not pass the Turing Test.
* That Clinton paid the debt. This is ludicrous in the extreme, and most importantly, completely irrelevant to anything I have ever said or implied. Pay attention.