Ahh, and your emotional talking points facts?

So nice of you to stick to logical fallacies and NOT actually address points I bring up. Both of you.

If you can't answer simple questions like cite the article in the Constitution authorizing such and such expenditures you have no business pillorying my points. You can't refute, so you stoop to bullshit, emotional arguments and ad hominems.

And the Constitution is NOT a 'whackjob talking point. If you think it is, you're just pathetic.