OK, well I don't really dig on the whole aborted fetus stem cell thing, but one of the comments he made kind of made me (and organ procurement organizations probably) say "eh?!?" He mentioned that he vetoed the bill not because of a religious opposition but because "we shouldn't be using our children for spare parts". That particular wording makes it sound like organ donation is a despicable procedure, because it would seem to be more along the lines of the "spare parts" ideology than stem cell research.
no subject